As a Dedicated Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Optimal Hope for American Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.

Amanda Mccarthy
Amanda Mccarthy

A seasoned gaming enthusiast with over a decade of experience in casino analytics and slot machine strategy development.