🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its action.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its decision was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The ruling occurs during a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

A senior House leader said the court had once again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.