🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or deny as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The latest limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying placards opposing mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a former clergyman and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.